NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 20x more texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 6.5x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 474.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 949 vs 2
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 119
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 December 2010 vs 31 May 2005 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 949 vs 2 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 vs 119 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
- 6.2x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 62 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 949 | 2 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1600 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1600 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2668 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Celsius |
Code name | GF106 | NV18 C1 |
Launch date | 24 December 2010 | 31 May 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 1284 | 1274 |
Price now | $87.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.65 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 178 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |