AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 68% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5412 vs 3902
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1841 vs 1682
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1841 vs 1682
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3260 vs 2668
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3260 vs 2668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 24 December 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5412 vs 3902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 vs 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 vs 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 vs 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 vs 2668 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1600 vs 1106
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1600 vs 1106
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1600 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1600 vs 1106 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5412 | 3902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 2668 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 949 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Oland | GF106 |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 24 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1287 | 1284 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $87.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.65 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 178 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 41.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1400
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 M435
