AMD Radeon R5 M435 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M435 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M435

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 25% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
  • Around 14% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
  • Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5652 vs 3902
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1621 vs 1600
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1621 vs 1600
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 May 2016 vs 24 December 2010
Core clock speed 780 MHz vs 625 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 192
Floating-point performance 547.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5652 vs 3902
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1621 vs 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1621 vs 1600

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

  • Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
  • Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1682 vs 1055
  • Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1682 vs 1055
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 2089
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 2089
  • Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 172
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 949 vs 800
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 20 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1682 vs 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1682 vs 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2668 vs 2089
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2668 vs 2089
PassMark - G2D Mark 301 vs 172
PassMark - G3D Mark 949 vs 800

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5652
3902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1055
1682
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1055
1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2089
2668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2089
2668
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
172
301
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
800
949
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1621
1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1621
1600
Name AMD Radeon R5 M435 NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Geekbench - OpenCL 5652 3902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1055 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1055 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2089 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2089 2668
PassMark - G2D Mark 172 301
PassMark - G3D Mark 800 949
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1621 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1621 1600
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.02

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 M435 NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Jet GF106
Launch date 15 May 2016 24 December 2010
Place in performance rating 1286 1284
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $599
Price now $87.99
Value for money (0-100) 17.65

Technical info

Boost clock speed 855 MHz
Core clock speed 780 MHz 625 MHz
Floating-point performance 547.2 gflops 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 320 192
Texture fill rate 17.1 GTexel / s 20 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,170 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 62 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 178 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 32 GB / s 41.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 2600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5