AMD Radeon R5 M435 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M435 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M435
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5652 vs 3902
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1621 vs 1600
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1621 vs 1600
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 24 December 2010 |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5652 vs 3902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 vs 1600 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 vs 1600 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1682 vs 1055
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1682 vs 1055
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 2089
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 2089
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 172
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 949 vs 800
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1682 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1682 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2668 vs 2089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2668 vs 2089 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 vs 172 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 949 vs 800 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5652 | 3902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1055 | 1682 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1055 | 1682 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2089 | 2668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2089 | 2668 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 301 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 800 | 949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 | 1600 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 | 1600 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Jet | GF106 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 24 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1286 | 1284 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $87.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.65 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 178 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 41.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |