NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 4000M and ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 36% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 350 MHz
19x more texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
84x more pipelines: 336 vs 4
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
5x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 500 MHz
32.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1282 vs 40
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 222
6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1254 vs 197
6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1254 vs 197

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 February 2011 vs 19 January 2006
Core clock speed	475 MHz vs 350 MHz
Texture fill rate	26.6 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	336 vs 4
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 128 MB
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1282 vs 40
PassMark - G2D Mark	271 vs 222
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1254 vs 197
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1254 vs 197

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1282

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

271

222

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

197

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

197

Name	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
PassMark - G3D Mark	1282	40
PassMark - G2D Mark	271	222
Geekbench - OpenCL	5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1254	197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1254	197

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	R500
Code name	GF104	M52
Launch date	22 February 2011	19 January 2006
Launch price (MSRP)	$449
Place in performance rating	1303	1332
Price now	$111.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	19.30
Technical info
Core clock speed	475 MHz	350 MHz
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	90 nm
Pipelines	336	4
Texture fill rate	26.6 GTexel / s	1.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt
Transistor count	1,950 million	107 million
Boost clock speed		350 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	9.0c
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	128 MB
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB / s	8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	250 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128
Shared memory	0	0