NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K610M and NVIDIA Quadro 4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
2.1x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 475 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 2500 MHz
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 865
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3195 vs 1254
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 865
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3195 vs 1254

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 22 February 2011
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 475 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2253 vs 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3195 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2253 vs 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3195 vs 1254

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
Around 75% higher pipelines: 336 vs 192
Around 70% better floating-point performance: 638.4 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1278 vs 715
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 218
2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5212 vs 1997
4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.724 vs 182.093
3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 81.823 vs 20.881
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1413 vs 1123
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1413 vs 1123

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	26.6 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	336 vs 192
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1278 vs 715
PassMark - G2D Mark	269 vs 218
Geekbench - OpenCL	5212 vs 1997
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	738.724 vs 182.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	81.823 vs 20.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1413 vs 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1413 vs 1123

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

715

1278

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

218

269

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1997

5212

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

182.093

738.724

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20.881

81.823

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1123

1413

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2253

865

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3195

1254

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1123

1413

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2253

865

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3195

1254

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K610M	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	715	1278
PassMark - G2D Mark	218	269
Geekbench - OpenCL	1997	5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	182.093	738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0	2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	20.881	81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1123	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2253	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3195	1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1123	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2253	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3195	1254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		33.126

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K610M	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GK208	GF104
Launch date	23 July 2013	22 February 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$229.99	$449
Place in performance rating	1296	1299
Price now	$75	$111.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	11.43	19.30
Technical info
Core clock speed	980 MHz	475 MHz
Floating-point performance	376.3 gflops	638.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	336
Texture fill rate	15.68 GTexel / s	26.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	1270 Million	1,950 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	medium sized	large
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	20.8 GB / s	80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus