NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 4000M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
2.6x more pipelines: 336 vs 128
Around 36% better floating-point performance: 638.4 gflops vs 470.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 141 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
2.3x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1100 MHz
2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1282 vs 494
3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 83
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.126 vs 15.56

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 February 2011 vs 16 January 2009
Pipelines	336 vs 128
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops vs 470.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 141 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1282 vs 494
PassMark - G2D Mark	271 vs 83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	33.126 vs 15.56

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

3.9x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 475 MHz
Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 26.6 GTexel / s
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.055 vs 21.42
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.986 vs 2.068
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.412 vs 81.823
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1254
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1254

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1836 MHz vs 475 MHz
Texture fill rate	47.2 billion / sec vs 26.6 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	54.055 vs 21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.986 vs 2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	108.412 vs 81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309 vs 1254

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1282

494

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

271

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

21.42

54.055

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.068

4.986

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33.126

15.56

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

81.823

108.412

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

3309

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

3309

Name	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
PassMark - G3D Mark	1282	494
PassMark - G2D Mark	271	83
Geekbench - OpenCL	5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	21.42	54.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.068	4.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	33.126	15.56
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	81.823	108.412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1254	3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1254	3309

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla
Code name	GF104	G92B
Launch date	22 February 2011	16 January 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	$229
Place in performance rating	1303	1305
Price now	$111.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	19.30
Technical info
Core clock speed	475 MHz	1836 MHz
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops	470.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	336	128
Texture fill rate	26.6 GTexel / s	47.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	141 Watt
Transistor count	1,950 million	754 million
CUDA cores		128
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options		2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB / s	70.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	1100 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI