NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA Quadro 4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 71% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 475 MHz
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 638.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 vs 1413
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 vs 865
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1254
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 vs 1413
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 vs 865
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1254

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

• Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1802 MHz
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1278 vs 798
• Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 149
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5212 vs 3874
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.42 vs 9.392
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.724 vs 157.479
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.068 vs 0.864
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.126 vs 16.101
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 81.823 vs 44.77

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	798 1278
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	149 269
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3874 5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.392 21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.479 738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.864 2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.101 33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.77 81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1589 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3235 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1589 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3235 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 1254

Compare specifications (specs)