NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 410 and AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 410
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 11.3 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 192 vs 80
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 271.1 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 438 vs 165
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 187
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 919 vs 401
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1311 vs 746
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1794 vs 1763
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 919 vs 401
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1311 vs 746
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1794 vs 1763
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2012 vs 5 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.3 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 271.1 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 438 vs 165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1311 vs 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1794 vs 1763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1311 vs 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1794 vs 1763 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 38 Watt
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2802 vs 1446
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2802 vs 1446 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 410
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 410 | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 438 | 165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1446 | 2802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.847 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1311 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1794 | 1763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1311 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1794 | 1763 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 410 | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Cedar |
Launch date | 7 August 2012 | 5 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 1460 | 1462 |
Price now | $272.28 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 271.1 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 11.3 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 176 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.26 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |