NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 6000 and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
• 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2691 vs 898
• 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 449 vs 97

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770

• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 574 MHz
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 204 Watt
• Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2988 MHz
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3335
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3335

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2691 898
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	449 97
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 8618
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 8618

Compare specifications (specs)