NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 574 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 204 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 2988 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3225 vs 2702
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11427 vs 9850
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 3501
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3689
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3335
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 3501
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3689
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3335
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 10 December 2010 |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 2988 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3225 vs 2702 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 vs 9850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 450 vs 347
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.377 vs 5.972
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.755 vs 355.305
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.66 vs 1.022
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.891 vs 15.706
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 90.839 vs 34.772
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 450 vs 347 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.377 vs 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.755 vs 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.66 vs 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 vs 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 90.839 vs 34.772 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3225 | 2702 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 347 | 450 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 | 9850 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 793.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 2.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 34.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3335 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 10 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 777 | 780 |
Price now | $309.99 | $332.21 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | 12.86 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,399 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 574 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 204 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 143.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |