NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs ATI FireMV 2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 7000 and ATI FireMV 2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 651 MHz vs 324 MHz
- 32.1x more texture fill rate: 41.66 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 128 MB
- 8.7x more memory clock speed: 3404 MHz vs 392 MHz
- 97.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3505 vs 36
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 397 vs 259
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 May 2012 vs 1 January 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz vs 324 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz vs 392 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 vs 36 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 vs 259 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200
- 13.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 204 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | ATI FireMV 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 | 36 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 | 259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.699 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | ATI FireMV 2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Rage 9 |
| Code name | GF110 | RV370 |
| Launch date | 2 May 2012 | 1 January 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
| Place in performance rating | 692 | 695 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 324 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 GTexel / s | 1.296 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB / s | 3.136 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 392 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
