NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 7000 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 651 MHz vs 580 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 41.66 GTexel / s vs 9.28 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,332 gflops vs 371.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3404 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 9.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3505 vs 366
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 397 vs 248
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 May 2012 vs 4 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 651 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 GTexel / s vs 9.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops vs 371.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 vs 366 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 vs 248 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
- 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 204 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 | 366 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 | 248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.699 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF110 | M88 |
Launch date | 2 May 2012 | 4 June 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 692 | 694 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 580 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 371.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 GTexel / s | 9.28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB / s | 48.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |