NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 52.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 41.66 GTexel / s
- 9.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 512
- 6.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3404 MHz
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 vs 32.699
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1653.567 vs 1142.156
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 51.693
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.278 vs 110.277
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 vs 3.796
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 vs 2 May 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 41.66 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,332 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3404 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 vs 32.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1653.567 vs 1142.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 vs 51.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.278 vs 110.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 vs 3.796 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 651 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 204 Watt vs 300 Watt
Core clock speed | 651 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18529 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 | 32.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1653.567 | 1142.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 | 51.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.278 | 110.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 | 3.796 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80m | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK210 | GF110 |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 | 2 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 690 | 692 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 651 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec | 41.66 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 204 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 12 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 240.6 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3404 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |