NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 52.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 41.66 GTexel / s
  • 9.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 512
  • 6.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3404 MHz
  • Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 vs 32.699
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1653.567 vs 1142.156
  • Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 51.693
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.278 vs 110.277
  • Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 vs 3.796
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 November 2014 vs 2 May 2012
Texture fill rate 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 41.66 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 2496 vs 512
Floating-point performance 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2x 12 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 3404 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 62.651 vs 32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1653.567 vs 1142.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 86.984 vs 51.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 258.278 vs 110.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.882 vs 3.796

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000

  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 651 MHz vs 562 MHz
  • Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 204 Watt vs 300 Watt
Core clock speed 651 MHz vs 562 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 204 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
62.651
32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1653.567
1142.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
86.984
51.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
258.278
110.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.882
3.796
Name NVIDIA Tesla K80m NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Geekbench - OpenCL 18529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 62.651 32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1653.567 1142.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 86.984 51.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 258.278 110.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.882 3.796
PassMark - G3D Mark 3505
PassMark - G2D Mark 397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla K80m NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name GK210 GF110
Launch date 17 November 2014 2 May 2012
Place in performance rating 690 692
Type Workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $14,499

Technical info

Boost clock speed 876 MHz
Core clock speed 562 MHz 651 MHz
Floating-point performance 2x 4,373 gflops 1,332 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 2x 2496 512
Texture fill rate 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec 41.66 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 204 Watt
Transistor count 7,080 million 3,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2x 12 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 2x 240.6 GB / s 177.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 2x 384 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 3404 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5