NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 651 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 108.3 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 512
- Around 95% better floating-point performance: 2,599 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 204 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.836 vs 32.699
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 vs 51.693
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 2 May 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 651 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops vs 1,332 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 204 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 vs 32.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 vs 51.693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3705 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 397 vs 279
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 vs 960.114
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 vs 3.038
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 110.277 vs 81.753
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 vs 3496 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 vs 279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 vs 960.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 vs 3.038 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 vs 81.753 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3496 | 3505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 | 397 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | 32.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | 1142.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | 3.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | 51.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | 110.277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 2 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 691 | 692 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 651 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s | 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIFirePro V8800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon E8950
