NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 5x more texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 260 vs 66
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 882 vs 240
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 882 vs 240
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 May 2006 vs 1 February 2006 |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 260 vs 66 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 882 vs 240 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 882 vs 240 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 112 vs 81
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 vs 81 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 260 | 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | 112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 882 | 240 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 882 | 240 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Curie |
Code name | G71 | G72 |
Launch date | 22 May 2006 | 1 February 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Place in performance rating | 1556 | 1558 |
Price now | $129.98 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
Transistor count | 278 million | 112 million |
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Pipelines | 4 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 173 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 42.2 GB / s | 3.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 450 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1320 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 64 / 32 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |