NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1814 vs 882
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1814 vs 882
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 22 May 2006 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1814 vs 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1814 vs 882 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 260 vs 224
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 55
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 260 vs 224 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 vs 55 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 224 | 260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 55 | 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6543 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1814 | 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1814 | 882 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | GT216 | G71 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 22 May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1554 | 1557 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Price now | $129.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 116.16 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 173 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.28 GB / s | 42.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |