NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M vs ATI Radeon 9200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M and ATI Radeon 9200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 250 MHz
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 11.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 45 vs 4
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2006 vs 1 May 2003 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 45 vs 4 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9200
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 vs 132
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 vs 132 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | ATI Radeon 9200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 45 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 132 | 135 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | ATI Radeon 9200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Rage 7 |
Code name | G72 | RV280 |
Launch date | 13 March 2006 | 1 May 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1190 | 1193 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 112 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 350 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | 64 | DDR |
Shared memory | no | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |