NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 28.1x more texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 60x more pipelines: 240 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 3.5x more maximum memory size: 896 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 26% higher memory clock speed: 1134 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 30.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1378 vs 45
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 January 2009 vs 13 March 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 240 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 896 MB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1134 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1378 vs 45 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
- 14.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 132 vs 63
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 132 vs 63 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1378 | 45 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 63 | 132 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Curie |
| Code name | GT200B | G72 |
| Launch date | 15 January 2009 | 13 March 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1225 | 1227 |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Floating-point performance | 673.9 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 240 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec | 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 112 million |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 127.0 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 448 Bit | 350 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1134 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | 64 |
| Shared memory | no | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
| CineFX 4.0 | ||
| Intellisample 4.0 | ||
| PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
| UltraShadow II | ||

