NVIDIA GeForce G102M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G102M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G102M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 460 MHz
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 38 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 58
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 890 vs 858
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 890 vs 858
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 12 September 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 460 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 38 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 890 vs 858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 890 vs 858 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 248 vs 168
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 90 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 vs 168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce G102M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 58 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 168 | 248 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 890 | 858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 890 | 858 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce G102M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | MCP79MX | G84 |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 12 September 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1617 | 1619 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Price now | $89.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.66 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 460 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Gigaflops | 48 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 38 Watt |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 289 million |
| Floating-point performance | 29.44 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 16 | |
| Texture fill rate | 3.68 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS | 2x DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 1.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |

