NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 8x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 640 vs 160
- 6.4x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 10.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3552 vs 330
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 441
- 25.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 476
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 7 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops vs 224.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3552 vs 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 vs 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 vs 476 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M
- 9.7x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1832 vs 1577
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 1671
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1832 vs 1577
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 1671
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 68 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1832 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1832 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 vs 1671 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3552 | 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | 476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 165.39 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 3493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 3493 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GM107 | Seymour |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 7 January 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
| Place in performance rating | 805 | 806 |
| Price now | $343.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 224.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon 610M (Dragon Range)
