NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 8x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 640 vs 160
- 6.4x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 10.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3559 vs 330
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 441
- 25.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 476
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 7 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops vs 224.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3559 vs 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 vs 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 vs 476 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M
- 9.7x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1832 vs 1577
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 1671
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1832 vs 1577
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 1671
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 68 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1832 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1832 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 vs 1671 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3559 | 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | 476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 3493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 3493 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | AMD Radeon HD 7450M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GM107 | Seymour |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 7 January 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
| Place in performance rating | 810 | 811 |
| Price now | $343.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 224.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAT600
