NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T600 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1124 MHz
  • 1187.7x more texture fill rate: 53.40 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 68 Watt
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27828 vs 12020
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.685 vs 40.695
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1176.034 vs 588.094
  • Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.06 vs 3.205
  • Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.328 vs 30.455
  • Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 263.201 vs 166.26
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 Apr 2021 vs 22 July 2014
Boost clock speed 1335 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate 53.40 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 68 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 27828 vs 12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 93.685 vs 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1176.034 vs 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.06 vs 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 55.328 vs 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 263.201 vs 166.26

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

  • Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed 1046 MHz vs 735 MHz
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
27828
12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
93.685
40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1176.034
588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.06
3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
55.328
30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
263.201
166.26
Name NVIDIA T600 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Geekbench - OpenCL 27828 12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 93.685 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1176.034 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.06 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 55.328 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 263.201 166.26
PassMark - G3D Mark 3559
PassMark - G2D Mark 545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1671
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1193

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA T600 NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Essentials

Architecture Turing Maxwell
Code name TU117 GM107
Launch date 12 Apr 2021 22 July 2014
Place in performance rating 813 810
Launch price (MSRP) $395.75
Price now $343.99
Type Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 13.01

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1335 MHz 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 1046 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 53.40 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1.709 TFLOPS
Pipelines 640 640
Pixel fill rate 42.72 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 53.40 GTexel/s 44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 68 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 1,870 million
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Single-slot
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU) 200 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 202 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s 80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5