Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel UHD Graphics 770

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1124 MHz
516x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
4.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 68 Watt
Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 vs 40.695
Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 588.094
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 vs 30.455

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	4 Nov 2021 vs 22 July 2014
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.20 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 68 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.442 vs 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1011.7 vs 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	40.941 vs 30.455

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

3.5x more core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 300 MHz
2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 546 vs 518
Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3564 vs 1912
Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 7624
Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 2.846
Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 94.384
Around 61% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1193 vs 739

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1046 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	640 vs 256
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	546 vs 518
PassMark - G3D Mark	3564 vs 1912
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 vs 7624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205 vs 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26 vs 94.384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193 vs 739

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

518

546

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1912

3564

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7624

12020

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.442

40.695

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1011.7

588.094

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.846

3.205

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.941

30.455

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

94.384

166.26

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

739

1193

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 770	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
PassMark - G2D Mark	518	546
PassMark - G3D Mark	1912	3564
Geekbench - OpenCL	7624	12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.442	40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1011.7	588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.846	3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	40.941	30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	94.384	166.26
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	739	1193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1671

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 770	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.2	Maxwell
Code name	Alder Lake GT1	GM107
Launch date	4 Nov 2021	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	811	813
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$395.75
Price now		$343.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	1124 MHz
Compute units	32
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1046 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	185.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1485 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	742.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	256	640
Pixel fill rate	11.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.20 GTexel/s	44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	68 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,439 gflops
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface		PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		202 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		5012 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5