NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 288
- 2x better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 616.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1536 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2718 vs 1953
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 413
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 732
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 1112
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 732
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 1112
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 288 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 616.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2718 vs 1953 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 vs 413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 1112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 1112 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2718 | 1953 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | 413 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6693 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 1112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 1112 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK106 | GF104 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 3 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
| Place in performance rating | 895 | 896 |
| Price now | $225.65 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | 616.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 288 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 19.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5550
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
