NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 288
- 2x better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 616.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1536 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2718 vs 1953
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 419 vs 413
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 732
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 1112
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 732
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 1112
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 3 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 616.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2718 vs 1953 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 419 vs 413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 1112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 1112 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2718 | 1953 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 419 | 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6703 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 1112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 1112 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK106 | GF104 |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 3 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
Place in performance rating | 895 | 896 |
Price now | $225.65 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | 616.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 19.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |