Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3321
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 1 March 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 24x more pipelines: 768 vs 32
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 1887
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 1887
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 3505
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 3505
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 32 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 3505 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3321 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2718 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 419 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6703 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Kepler |
| Code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 1 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 893 | 895 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
| Price now | $225.65 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1250
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7200
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
