AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3321
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 1 March 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 338
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2719 vs 935
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6676 vs 5635
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 1935
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 1935
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 2380
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 2380
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 vs 338 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2719 vs 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6676 vs 5635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 2380 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 418 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 935 | 2719 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 | 6676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Oland | GK106 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 894 | 895 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
Price now | $225.65 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 134.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5616 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |