NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 6.2x more texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 1152 vs 400
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 440.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2756 vs 528
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 245
- 7.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8787 vs 1186
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 1684
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3246 vs 3070
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 1684
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3246 vs 3070
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 23 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops vs 440.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 vs 528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 vs 245 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8787 vs 1186 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 vs 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 vs 3070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 vs 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 vs 3070 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 | 528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | 245 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8787 | 1186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1105 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 | 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 | 3070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1105 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 | 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 | 3070 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK104 | Pinewood |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 23 November 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 1084 | 1085 |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | 440.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s | 11 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |