NVIDIA Quadro K420 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K420 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K420
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 192 vs 72
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 336.4 gflops vs 187.49 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 43 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 744 vs 461
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 282 vs 62
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 2 February 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 876 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 72 |
| Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops vs 187.49 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 43 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 744 vs 461 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 282 vs 62 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
- 1024x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8132 vs 1847
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2502 vs 1241
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2502 vs 1241
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8132 vs 1847 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2502 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2502 vs 1241 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K420
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 744 | 461 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 282 | 62 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1847 | 8132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.977 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.254 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 598 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1241 | 2502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 | 2502 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 2 February 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $96.67 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1478 | 1479 |
| Price now | $89.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.27 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 876 MHz | 540 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops | 187.49 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 72 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 43 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 160 mm | 175 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB / 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1580 MHz |
| Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.28 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K420 with others
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3650
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 380M
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 320 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820M
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M335DX
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
