NVIDIA Quadro K500M vs NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K500M and NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 80x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 480 vs 6
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 1 March 2002 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 480 vs 6 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
- 58.8x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 199 vs 184
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 vs 184 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K500M | NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | 199 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 480 | 6 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K500M | NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Celsius |
Code name | GK107 | NV18 A4 |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 1 March 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 891 | 894 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | 800 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 |