NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 96x more pipelines: 2304 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 59x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6135 vs 104
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 553 vs 320
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 9 January 2008 |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 24 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6135 vs 104 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 553 vs 320 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6135 | 104 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 553 | 320 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19220 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.147 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1278.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.996 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.307 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5946 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5946 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | |
| Code name | GK110B | MCP79Mx + NB9M |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 9 January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,699.74 | |
| Place in performance rating | 535 | 537 |
| Price now | $523.66 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 771 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,553 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 148.0 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
