NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.147 vs 30.133
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3582
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3331
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3582
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3331

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 667 MHz
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 902 MHz vs 771 MHz
• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 173.2 GTexel / s vs 148.0 GTexel / s
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 3,553 gflops
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 vs 1278.433
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 3.996
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 vs 50.08
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 148.747 vs 115.307
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 5946
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 5946

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	47.147 30.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1278.433 1441.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.996 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.08 64.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.307 148.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5946 9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5946 9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3331

Compare specifications (specs)