NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

AMD Radeon HD 7450M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 42% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 700 MHz
5.7x more texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 512 vs 160
4.5x better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2849 vs 330
18.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 476
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1832
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1832

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 7 January 2012
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 700 MHz
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 160
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2849 vs 330
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849 vs 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 1832

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M

5.7x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 40 Watt
512x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 308
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 3358
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 3358

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	7 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	441 vs 308
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3493 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3493 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2849

330

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

308

441

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

476

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

1832

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3493

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

1832

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3493

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	AMD Radeon HD 7450M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2849	330
PassMark - G2D Mark	308	441
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3493
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Code name	GM107	Seymour
Launch date	18 August 2015	7 January 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89
Place in performance rating	813	816
Price now	$203.37
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	700 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	224.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	512	160
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	5.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	7 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	370 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus