NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
3.3x more core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 300 MHz
10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
Around 15% better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 vs 1530
Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 4536
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 2475
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 958
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2304
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 2475
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 958
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2304

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 48
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2835 vs 1530
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849 vs 4536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 2304

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 vs 307

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	562 vs 307

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2835

1530

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

307

562

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

4536

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

958

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

2304

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

958

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

2304

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark	2835	1530
PassMark - G2D Mark	307	562
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	4536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	2304
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Generation 8.0
Code name	GM107	Broadwell GT3e
Launch date	18 August 2015	5 September 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89
Place in performance rating	806	808
Price now	$203.37
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	300 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	883.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	512	48
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	55.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x1
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
Quick Sync