NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 43.72 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 94% better floating-point performance: 1,399 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3233 vs 782
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 247

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M

• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 10582

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3233 782
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 247
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10582 15796

Compare specifications (specs)