NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 43.72 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 48% better floating-point performance: 1,399 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3242 vs 1938
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10582 vs 9616
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.821 vs 24.788
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.297 vs 638.196
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 2.619
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.966 vs 41.414
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.204 vs 112.347
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 2809
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 2809

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 535 vs 318
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 2645
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 2645

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 1938
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 535
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10582 9616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.821 24.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	793.297 638.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.631 2.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.966 41.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.204 112.347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4941 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2645 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4941 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2645 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3358

Compare specifications (specs)