NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 384
- Around 98% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7602 vs 3362
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7602 vs 3362
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 8 March 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz vs 823 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1,280 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 vs 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 vs 3362 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 2749
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3093
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 2749
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3093
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6895 vs 2749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6895 vs 2749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3093 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6186 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19089 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 8 March 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 552 | 471 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1013 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1,280 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 128.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M4000M with others
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
