NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 975 MHz
• Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1013 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20720 vs 19892
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 251.464
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 7602
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2749
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3093
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 7602
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2749
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3093

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1,280 vs 768
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6149 vs 5919
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 323
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 vs 75.758
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.338 vs 843.503
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.157 vs 5.071
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 68.443 vs 24.676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5919 6149
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 412
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20720 19892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 251.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3093

Compare specifications (specs)