NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1013 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20698 vs 19892
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 251.464
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 7602
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2749
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3093
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 7602
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2749
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3093
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 18 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1013 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20698 vs 19892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 251.464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 7602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 2749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 7602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 2749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 3093 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1,280 vs 768
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6149 vs 5919
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 323
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 vs 75.758
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.338 vs 843.503
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.157 vs 5.071
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 68.443 vs 24.676
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1,280 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 2,488 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6149 vs 5919 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 vs 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 vs 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 vs 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 vs 24.676 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 6149 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 412 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20698 | 19892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 81.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1235.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 6.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 68.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 251.464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 7602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 2749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 7602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 2749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3093 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP106B | GM204 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 18 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 563 | 564 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1013 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1,280 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 78 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireMV 2250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5010M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
