AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1013 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 410
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 vs 68.443
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 vs 18 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1013 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 410 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 vs 68.443 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 1,280 vs 896
- 1134.5x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6143 vs 4102
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19918 vs 17594
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 vs 55
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.338 vs 970.421
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.157 vs 4.656
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.464 vs 237.944
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7602 vs 6821
- 65.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7602 vs 115.4
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1,280 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6143 vs 4102 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19918 vs 17594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 vs 55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 vs 970.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 vs 4.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 vs 237.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 vs 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 vs 115.4 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4102 | 6143 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 410 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17594 | 19918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 81.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 1235.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 6.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 68.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 251.464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | 7602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | 7602 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | 0 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Baffin | GM204 |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Place in performance rating | 565 | 567 |
| Price now | $179.50 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1013 MHz |
| Compute units | 14 | |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | 2,496 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1,280 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s | 78 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) with others
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
ATIFireMV 2250
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P600
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAP104-100
