NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 9x more texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 193.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1162 vs 6
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 184 vs 154
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 vs 6 February 2002 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1162 vs 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 vs 154 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1162 | 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M500M | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kelvin |
Code name | GM108 | NV25 A3 |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 | 6 February 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1081 | 1080 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 63 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |