NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 706 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2174 vs 1105
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2174 vs 1105
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 vs 1105 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- Around 88% better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2756 vs 1163
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 184
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8787 vs 6053
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 1729
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 1729
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3246 vs 3122
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3246 vs 3122
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 vs 1163 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 vs 184 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8787 vs 6053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 vs 1729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 vs 1729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 vs 3122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 vs 3122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 | 2756 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | 325 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6053 | 8787 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 | 3246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M500M | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK104 |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1081 | 1084 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 67.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic |