NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7550M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 756 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 78% higher boost clock speed: 977 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 31.26 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 512 vs 400
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,000 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 420 vs 403
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2811 vs 465
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8009 vs 5371
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 7 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 756 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 977 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 vs 403 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2811 vs 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8009 vs 5371 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7550M
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 30 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7550M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7550M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | 403 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2811 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8009 | 5371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3854 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3854 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7550M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Thames |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 561 | 559 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 977 MHz | 550 MHz |
Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |