NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M385X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 vs 267
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2793 vs 1994
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 vs 267 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2793 vs 1994 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385X
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 756 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 977 MHz
- Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- Around 97% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49760 vs 8005
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4079 vs 3854
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4079 vs 3854
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 756 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 977 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 1,000 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 49760 vs 8005 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4079 vs 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4079 vs 3854 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M385X
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 | 267 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2793 | 1994 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8005 | 49760 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3854 | 4079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3854 | 4079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M385X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Strato |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 571 | 573 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 977 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 896 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6610 XL
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon E2400
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID K120Q
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385X
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
