NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 756 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 31.26 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,000 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 391 vs 268
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2775 vs 1114
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8073 vs 4554
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3854 vs 1859
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3854 vs 1859
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1945
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1945
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 30 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 756 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 vs 268 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2775 vs 1114 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8073 vs 4554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3854 vs 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3854 vs 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3344 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 977 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 977 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 | 268 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2775 | 1114 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8073 | 4554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3854 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3854 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | GM107 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 584 | 1216 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 977 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 |