NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3684
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3684
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3325
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3325

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 8 April 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Around 5% higher core clock speed: 796 MHz vs 756 MHz
Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1163 MHz vs 977 MHz
Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 56.64 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
Around 81% better floating-point performance: 1,812 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 403
Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3995 vs 2765
Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14563 vs 8012
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5523 vs 3854
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5523 vs 3854

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	796 MHz vs 756 MHz
Boost clock speed	1163 MHz vs 977 MHz
Texture fill rate	56.64 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	564 vs 403
PassMark - G3D Mark	3995 vs 2765
Geekbench - OpenCL	14563 vs 8012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5523 vs 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5523 vs 3854

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

403

564

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2765

3995

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8012

14563

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3854

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3854

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3325

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3325

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
PassMark - G2D Mark	403	564
PassMark - G3D Mark	2765	3995
Geekbench - OpenCL	8012	14563
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3854	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3854	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		225.868

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GM107	GM206
Launch date	11 January 2017	8 April 2016
Place in performance rating	581	582
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$437.75
Price now		$409.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.23
Technical info
Boost clock speed	977 MHz	1163 MHz
Core clock speed	756 MHz	796 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,000 gflops	1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	768
Texture fill rate	31.26 GTexel / s	56.64 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	2,940 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		201 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management