AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 756 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 977 MHz
- 12.3x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 4096 vs 512
- 12.3x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6958 vs 3854
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6958 vs 3854
- 8.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68507 vs 8012
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 11 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 756 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 977 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 1,000 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 vs 3854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 vs 3854 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68507 vs 8012 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1634
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1634
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1846
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1846
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1846 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1846 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 | 3854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 | 3854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1634 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1634 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1846 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1846 | 3358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68507 | 8012 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2765 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Vega 10 | GM107 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 580 | 581 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 977 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 756 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 1,000 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 31.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 482.8 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |