NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1303 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 3840 vs 640
- 6.7x better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 5923
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 5923
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1303 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 vs 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 vs 5923 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 | 20035 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP107 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 525 | 204 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
| Price now | $4,403.52 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 12,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 3840 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 11,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | |
| Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 9016 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 340 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
