NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M60
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3000 and NVIDIA Tesla M60 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 95% higher core clock speed: 1088 MHz vs 557 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9579 vs 8663
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 886
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1791
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9579 vs 8663
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 886
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1791
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1088 MHz vs 557 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 vs 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 vs 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1791 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1280
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7927 vs 6636
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 444
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26865 vs 25146
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7927 vs 6636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26865 vs 25146 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6636 | 7927 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25146 | 26865 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1791 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N17E-Q1 | GM204 |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 382 | 466 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1088 MHz | 557 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2x 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168 GB / s | 2x 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin |