NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 701.2x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 10 GB/s
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1139 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1404 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55407 vs 36659
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 13448
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 13448
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3717
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3717
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3358
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1139 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1404 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55407 vs 36659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 vs 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 vs 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9078 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36659 | 55407 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 4195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 4195 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7222 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 15 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 273 | 275 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
| Price now | $439.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1404 MHz | 1771 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1139 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 10 GB/s |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
