AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 1139 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1404 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9390 vs 9078
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 549
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45611 vs 36659
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 vs 21 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz vs 1139 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1404 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9390 vs 9078 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 vs 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45611 vs 36659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 175 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 vs 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 vs 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9390 | 9078 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45611 | 36659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 13448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 13448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4758 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 30 | GP104 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 | 21 February 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 271 | 273 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz | 1139 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |