NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1139 MHz vs 875 MHz
Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 928 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
1001.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36732 vs 28360
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13448 vs 10021
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13448 vs 10021

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 February 2018 vs 7 November 2013
Core clock speed	1139 MHz vs 875 MHz
Boost clock speed	1404 MHz vs 928 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	36732 vs 28360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13448 vs 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13448 vs 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3342

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9457 vs 9156
Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 632 vs 540

Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	9457 vs 9156
PassMark - G2D Mark	632 vs 540

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9156

9457

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

540

632

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36732

28360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13448

10021

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13448

10021

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3342

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	9156	9457
PassMark - G2D Mark	540	632
Geekbench - OpenCL	36732	28360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13448	10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13448	10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3342
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		182.11
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3390

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP104	GK110B
Launch date	21 February 2018	7 November 2013
Place in performance rating	274	393
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Price now		$749.99
Value for money (0-100)		14.80
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1404 MHz	928 MHz
Core clock speed	1139 MHz	875 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	7,200 million	7,080 million
CUDA cores		2880
Floating-point performance		5,345 gflops
Pipelines		2880
Texture fill rate		210 billion / sec
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Maximum RAM amount		3 GB
Memory bandwidth		336 GB / s
Memory bus width		384 Bit
Memory type		GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA