NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8.9x more texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 648 MHz
- 274x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1644 vs 6
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 vs 173
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 6 February 2002 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 648 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1644 vs 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 vs 173 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1644 | 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | 173 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kelvin |
Code name | GP107 | NV25 A3 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 6 February 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 1000 | 998 |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 63 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 145 mm | 216 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 5.18 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 648 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | SDR |